The Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) is a consortium of state education agencies
and national educational organizations dedicated to the reform of the preparation, licensing, and on-going professional development
of teachers. Created in 1987, INTASC's primary constituency is state education agencies responsible for teacher licensing,
program approval, and professional development. Its work is guided by one basic premise: An effective teacher must be able
to integrate content knowledge with the specific strengths and needs of students to assure that all students learn and perform at high levels.
Mission of INTASC
The mission of INTASC is to provide a forum for its member states to learn about and collaborate in the development
of
- compatible educational policy on teaching among the states
- new accountability requirements for teacher preparation programs
- new techniques to assess the performance of teachers for
licensing and evaluation
- new programs to enhance the professional development of teachers
Model State Teacher Policy
Standards are the Policy That Drive the System
INTASC believes that all education policy should be driven by what we want our P-12 students to know and be able to do.
Thus, all aspects of a state’s education system should be aligned with and organized to achieve the state’s policy
as embodied in its P-12 student standards. This includes its teacher licensing system. Teacher licensing standards
are the state’s policy for what all teachers must know and be able to do in order to effectively help all students achieve
the P-12 student standards. The teacher licensing standards become the driving force behind how a state’s teacher
licensing system (program approval, licensing assessments, and professional development) is organized and implemented. Thus,
a state’s process for approving teacher preparation programs should be designed to verify that a program is aligned
with the teacher licensing standards and provides opportunities for candidates to meet the standards. The state licensing
assessments should verify that an individual teacher candidate has the knowledge and skills outlined in the licensing standards.
The state’s professional development requirements for re-licensing should document that in-service practicing teachers
are receiving professional development that is aligned with and helping them reach the licensing standards.
What INTASC Has Accomplished So Far
INTASC has been working to develop model policy that states can use as a resource as they work to align their own
teacher licensing systems. So far INTASC has accomplished the following:
- developed model
“core” standards for what all beginning teachers should know, be like, and be able to do in order to
practice responsibly, regardless of the subject matter or grade level being taught
- translated the core standards into model licensing
standards in mathematics, English language arts, science, special education, foreign languages, arts, and are developing standards
for elementary education and social studies/civics
- initiated development of a new licensing examination,
the Test for Teaching Knowledge, which will measure a beginning teacher’s knowledge and skill in the core standards
- developed and validated a model performance assessment
in the form of a candidate portfolio in math, English/language arts and science that is linked to INTASC’s standards
- developed principles for quality teacher preparation programs
to guide teacher preparation programs on how to incorporate INTASC’s performance-based standards
- hosts an annual professional development academy to
help states develop capacity to implement a standards-based licensing system by teaching individuals to score INTASC portfolios,
to serve as mentors for beginning teachers, and to reform teacher preparation programs so that they incorporate the model
standards
- provides ongoing technical assistance to states as
they implement standards-based licensing systems
- commissioned papers on the legal implications of a
standards-based teacher licensing system, and on assessment instruments for teacher licensing.
Who Develops INTASC’s Model Policies?
Various committees of practicing teachers, teacher educators, school leaders, and state agency staff crafted INTASC’s
standards, which articulate what all beginning teachers should know and be able to do to teach effectively. The various committees’
missions were to take the INTASC core standards and translate them into appropriate policy for the teacher licensing system,
specifically into licensing standards for individual candidates and standards for institutions that provide preservice and
inservice programs. These committees worked from existing documents of the various professional associations, particularly
with recommended subject area standards for P-12 students. The purpose of this work was not to create yet another standards
document, but to consider the best thinking of education practitioners and researchers, and to articulate the collective voice
of the states regarding sound teacher licensing policy.
Public Comment Is Requested on the Model Policies
INTASC engages the profession and the public in a dialogue about the soundness and appropriateness of all
the proposed teacher standards. First, INTASC collects feedback on the standards through a questionnaire. Second, INTASC conducts
focus groups that respond to the model standards, analyze how current state policies and programs would have to be revised
to reflect the standards, and suggest strategies for bringing about these changes. The purpose of the focus groups is
not only to refine and fine-tune the standards, but also to start laying the groundwork necessary for states to take ownership
of the standards.
INTASC’s Standards are a Resource for States
INTASC’s role is one of consensus
building among the states, and not decision making. All authority for state policy resides within each state’s governance
structure. The INTASC standards are “model” standards and intended to be a RESOURCE that all states can use to
develop their own state standards. INTASC encourages states to take the model standards and discuss and debate them among
their own stakeholders to come up with their own language. INTASC’s hope is that states will agree with and honor the
values in the model standards, and in this way move us toward consensus and compatible educational policies around what good
teaching looks like and how it can be assessed.